Vetrics

Integrations

Why we recommend some integrations more strongly than others

8 min read

A veterinary practice does not need to use every available integration. What matters is whether the connection helps staff finish a real job with less retyping and less checking across multiple systems. That is why some integrations are ones we actively recommend for new setups, while others remain available mainly for practices that already use them.

The difference usually comes down to support and clarity. If a payment, stock order or lab result sits in a workflow we can help diagnose end to end, that is easier for the practice than a connection that technically exists but still leaves staff piecing things together by hand.

Stripe, because payment should stay with the invoice

Stripe is the recommended payment route because it keeps invoices, terminals, subscriptions and pay links close together in one workflow. In day-to-day terms, that means the amount on the reader should match the amount on the invoice, and reception does not need to type it again into a separate till.

Where supported, Stripe Terminal hardware such as the S710, S700 and WisePOS E also makes support easier because the hardware and the payment flow are part of the same path. If a practice already uses another payment provider such as Dojo, Square, SumUp or Adyen, those options can still be relevant. They are simply not the default route we would usually suggest when designing a new setup from scratch. GoCardless remains the Direct Debit option for practices already collecting that way.

Xero, because month-end should be a review, not re-entry

For many UK practices, Xero is the accounting system already in place, so it makes sense to recommend a straightforward invoice and payment flow into that ledger. The aim is to let the practice reconcile month-end rather than retype month-end.

That does not mean every practice should move its books. If your finance team already works in Sage or QuickBooks, it is usually better to connect the PMS to the ledger you already trust than to start a migration just to make the setup look tidier.

Labs and NVS, because results and stock should not need a second round of admin

Lab integrations matter because results are most useful when they land on the consult with their ranges and flags, ready for the clinical team to review and file in the right place. Where available, IDEXX and Antech can reduce the late-afternoon job of checking separate portals and attaching PDFs manually.

For stock and ordering, NVS is helpful when the catalogue, ordering process and goods-in workflow match the products the practice actually uses. That reduces the gap between what the shelf says and what the system says, which is especially useful for nurses and managers trying to keep dispensary stock accurate.

Messaging should stay on the client record

SMS works best when reminders, payment links and other operational messages are sent through the practice messaging route and logged on the client record. That helps staff see what was sent without checking a separate phone or inbox. Depending on market, this may use Twilio or the managed Telnyx route.

WhatsApp Business can also feed into the same inbox for practices that already rely on it. It is an add-on rather than a requirement, and it should not replace normal checks about who the practice is speaking to before discussing clinical or financial details.

Rota links help keep the diary honest

If the rota is managed in RotaCloud, it is useful when published shifts and leave are reflected in who can actually be booked in the diary. That saves reception and management time because staff are not updating availability in two places and then finding out a clinician was offered appointments while off site or on leave.

BreatheHR can help in a similar way for absence information if that is already the HR system your practice uses.

What we would not treat as a first-choice setup

  • Zapier can be useful as a bridge to a niche tool, but it should not become the main source of practice truth.
  • Klaviyo or HubSpot may suit practices that already run an additional CRM, but the clinical record should still stay in the PMS.
  • AI model keys such as OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini remain optional. If you do not want AI-assisted jobs turned on, leave them off.
  • Ads and analytics tools can help marketing teams, but they do not solve day-to-day workflow problems on the diary, invoice or consult.

The simplest way to choose integrations is to ask which ones remove a repeat admin task your team does every day. If an integration helps the front desk take payment against the right invoice, helps a vet review results on the consult, or helps a manager reconcile accounts without retyping, it is doing useful work. If it mainly adds another dashboard, another contact database or another support dependency, it may be better left off.

Questions people ask

What payment integration does Vetrics recommend?
Stripe, with Stripe Terminal readers we can support. Other processors stay available if you already have the hardware or the merchant account.
Does Vetrics recommend Xero for veterinary practices?
Yes, when you are choosing a ledger. If you already run Sage or QuickBooks, use that connector instead of moving the books for us.
Why recommend IDEXX or Antech in a PMS?
So results land on the consult with ranges, instead of a PDF in a lab website that never gets filed.
Do we have to use WhatsApp or AI integrations?
No. Messaging and model keys are optional. Use them when they help the team keep conversations or drafts on the record, and leave them off if they do not.

Related reading

Want to map the stack you already have?

Bring the till, the ledger and the lab. We will say what we recommend and what we will only support.

Why Vetrics recommends Stripe, Xero and these veterinary integrations - Vetrics